From Becca Trabin: Everybody Simmer Down, Now

The Huffington Post reported last week that psychologists in London find paranoia to be much more commonplace than previously thought, and it’s continually on the rise.
According to British psychologist Daniel Freeman, nearly one in four Londoners regularly have paranoid thoughts. Freeman is a paranoia expert at the Institute of Psychiatry at King’s College and the author of a book on the subject.
Paranoia is defined as the exaggerated or unfounded fear that others are trying to hurt you. That includes thoughts that other people are trying to upset or annoy you, for example, by staring, laughing, or making unfriendly gestures.
Surveys of several thousands of people in Britain, the United States and elsewhere have found that rates of paranoia are slowly rising, although researchers’ estimates of how many of us have paranoid thoughts varies widely, from 5 percent to 50 percent.
The obvious question seems to be: Does anyone find this surprising? For the better part of eight years, the most powerful people in the world have been instigating psychotic associations in individuals through the use of paranoid, hysterical rhetoric. Feelings of mass helplessness, suspicion and uncertainty stemming from the ever-increasing pace of change have been deepened by perpetual messages and policies meant to reinforce those feelings.
It’s not enough to make mental health a public issue. Public issues need to be taken seriously in the public sphere as mental health issues. A doctor who treats an individual for paranoid delusions in the midst of rising rates of paranoia without giving consideration to the mood of the milieu does a disservice to his/her patient by forcing the patient to further internalize the society’s illness.
Likewise, a public discourse that ignores, denies or trivializes the existence of mental illness on the social level (i.e. pretending that certain policies are merely political and not signs of psychological disturbance, or calling them signs of disturbance but failing to take the next step in addressing the problem)—such a public discourse is doomed to slip away into its own unacknowledged madness.
As Stephen Colbert noted in his Word the day after the election, the real victory was the victory over fear. As we regain our strengths in our new climate of hope, perhaps we can also be more vigilant in observing the danger signs of unconscious psychotic impulses playing themselves out on a mass level so we can nip them in the democratic bud.
Liz | 11:02 AM | Uncategorized




Interesting political reading, Becca. Nevertheless, it does seem that the definitions of mental illnesses are increasingly broad. The author quotes one scientist: “We are now starting to discover that madness is human and that we need to look at normal people to understand it,” said Dr. Jim van Os, a professor of psychiatry at Maastricht University in the Netherlands. I wonder how much of this marked increase in paranoid thoughts is due to evolving definitions of the problem.
Also, to what degree are these types of thoughts simply instincts of self-preservation? There are often real situations where it pays to be on your guard. The author cites one study that included a virtual reality subway ride. After the hammer attack incident on the Broad St Line, wouldn’t we be foolish not to pay better attention to strangers?
In addition, some of these thoughts might not be unfounded. In the workplace with everyone hustling to get ahead I’m sure there ARE instances where other are trying to “get you” by getting ahead of you. So maybe we can add capitalism’s survival of the fittest mentality to demagogic fearmongering as one of the causes of this increase in paranoia. It sounds like you might be amenable to that idea.
The ultimate aim of government is not to rule, or restrain, by fear, nor to exact obedience, but contrariwise, to free every man from fear, that he may live in all possible security; in other words, to strengthen his natural right to exist and work without injury to himself or others.
No, the object of government is not to change men from rational beings into beasts or puppets, but to enable them to develop their minds and bodies in security, and to employ their reason unshackled; neither showing hatred, anger, or deceit, nor watched with the eyes of jealousy and injustice. In fact, the true aim of government is liberty.
–BARUCH SPINOZA (1632-77, “Tractatus Theologico-Politicus,” Writings on Political Philosophy, ed. A. G. A. Balz, trans. R. H. M. Elwes, p. 65 (1937)
Good point. But what about those who are paranoid about the changes coming? I expect they will stay that way.
Reply: